Board Diagnostics

AI Governance Readiness Diagnostic

A structured diagnostic that shows your board exactly where its AI governance is robust, where it's exposed, and what to address first — built for individual directors, not management self-assessment.

A director asks the audit chair: "Are we governing AI properly?" The answer comes back: "I believe so." Nobody produces a framework. Nobody names what "properly" actually means. The question gets parked. The exposure doesn't.

What this is

A board-level diagnostic, not a management self-assessment

The AI Governance Readiness Diagnostic is an independent instrument for directors — designed to give you an honest read on where your board's AI governance currently stands. Not where management thinks it stands. Not where it's assumed to stand because nobody has named the gaps.

Use it as a pre-meeting primer, a board evaluation input, or the starting point for a structured governance review. It produces outputs you can take into a board discussion — evidence in place of intuition, structure in place of assumption.

What's inside

Five governance dimensions, one clear output

  • Diagnostic questions across five governance dimensions: oversight structure, accountability clarity, information flows to the board, AI risk visibility, and director capability
  • An individual scoring guide with calibration notes — how to read your own results honestly, not charitably
  • An output interpretation framework for reading collective versus individual results when used across a full board
  • A summary template for reporting diagnostic findings into the board agenda — converting a private exercise into a structured governance item
When to use it

Four moments that call for this diagnostic

Before entering an AI governance review or a board evaluation with AI as a focus area — to arrive with an independent read rather than management's version.
When a new director joins and wants an honest picture of the board's current AI governance posture before forming a view.
After an AI incident or near-miss surfaces a gap that nobody had formally named — to understand the governance dimensions of what happened.
When preparing the board for a strategic AI discussion with management, and you need to know what the board can credibly hold management to.
Who it's for

Designed for individuals who carry fiduciary responsibility

The diagnostic works at the individual level — one director completing it gets something actionable. Distributed across a full board, it creates a collective picture that can anchor a governance review.

Board Directors Non-Executive Directors Chairs Audit Committee Members Risk Committee Members Company Secretaries Governance Professionals CAEs
What you'll be able to do

Four things this changes

  • Name your board's specific AI governance gaps rather than working from generalities or management assurances
  • Prioritise what needs addressing first — and have a rationale for that prioritisation when challenged
  • Enter an AI governance conversation with evidence, not intuition — and hold the conversation at the right level
  • Use the outputs to shape a structured board agenda item, rather than leaving the gap unaddressed until something goes wrong
This product is part of The Closed Session's AI governance series, which maps to the Governance Decoded AI governance editorial arc. Edition 7 — "You're Overseeing AI — Do You Actually Know What You're Overseeing?" — provides the editorial foundation for this diagnostic.

AI Governance Readiness Diagnostic

Board Diagnostics  ·  €59  ·  Digital delivery